7 1/4" x 9 1/2" (18 x 24 cm)
Monthly 4 #76
Refill/Reference numbers: 761, 762, 763, 767, 769, 7601
All Customer Reviews
Anonymous Reviewer said:(from Boston, MA on January 12, 2008)
"The Good: Monthly format The Bad: -Weeks are Monday-Sunday. I like Sunday-Saturday, like a regular calendar -lots of extra writing. Seems they are afraid of blank space. For example, I don't need to see the month eight times acrsoo the top. I don't need the day of the year and days left. I don't want labels like "priority, phone, fax, write, see/do". Leave it blank!"
Anonymous Reviewer said:(from El Cerrito, CA on November 30, 2007)
"This planner is o.k., BUT you cannot get refills for it! I was assured Barnes and Noble would have it when I bought the planner from them, but they don't - couldn't even find it in their catalog! THIS is the difference between a good planner and a so-so one - CAN you keep the same one year after year, without a lot of trouble. Not so, in this case. Am moving to a brand with more readily available refills, and will avoid this one henceforth."
Anonymous Reviewer said:(from Manhattan, KS on September 24, 2007)
"Love the cover and quality but I cannot get used to Sunday being at the end of the week instead of at the beginning! Please consider starting the week with Sunday and making it the same size box in future refills or I will change to a different planner."
Anonymous Reviewer said:(from seattle, WA on June 30, 2007)
"Love the 18 month and the extras at the end, especially the maps. Have problems sometimes with the Mon-Sun layout since most calendars or Sun-Sat. Would recommend shading Sat/Sun a light gray or blue to make it stand out. Also, would like Sun the same size as the other days. "
Erik said:(from San Francisco, CA on December 22, 2006)
"I like the six row format, it prevents the 1st and 31st of the month from getting cut in half. Having Sat. and Sun. together at the weekend makes sense, but it is too unconventional for me -- I couldn't get used to it."
